Crime+Scene+Script

media type="custom" key="4713473" My name is Detective Jones. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene on a hot summer day where some people had called for help, after they had found thier friend laying on his patio dead. I had checked for a pulse, there was none. I had called for more back-up to help me scope the beach house and look for any type of evidence that could possibly help. The alleg​ed victim was Felix Navidad.

The suspects guilty of committing this crime are Kendra and Alfredo. Kendra had left a note beihnd saying, Dear martha, im glad its over Felix is dead. ill be rich soon,Vera. It seems Kendra had been framing Vera because her handwriting matched to the note. Alfredo had left fingerprints on Felixs(along with Vera)cup when they were sitting on the patio having a glass of cola. This suspect's guilt was confimed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the secret note. The evidence was found on the crime scene. The test performed hand writing test. The results of the test were Kendras handwriting was on the note but was signed by Vera. This connects the suspect to the crime because the note said she was glad Felix was dead and she will be rich soon.

The next piece of evidence collected was a powdery shoe print was found all over the patio the place of Navidads death. The test performed was The Powder Study. The results of the test was that cornstarch was found on Kendras shoe print. This connects the suspect to the crime because it shows Kendra and Alfredo were both wearing tenis shoes. . The last piece of evidence collected was the base in Felixs glass. It was found only to be in Felixs glass. The test performed was pH test. The results of the test were Alfredos lass was neutral and Felixs glass had a base in it. This connects the suspect to the crime because only Alfredo had a natural type of cola. Felix wouldnt just drink a base type of cola knowing it had poison in it, if he did he most likely would have known he would die.

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. First Kendra left a note behind signing it by Vera, next her and Alfredo left powdery shoeprints behind that was cornstarch. (He didn't have powder on his shoes!) Then Alfredo left his fingerprints on Felixs cup which also had acid in it (Kendra's prints were the only one's found on the cup other than Felix's). Lastly Felix had base in his cola WHICH had Alfredos fingerprints on it. Therefore, Kendra and Alfredo committed the crime of Felixs murder because it seems that they teamed up and murder Felix. **Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. || __** Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. **__ || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 51% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || ** __Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.__  ** || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || __**The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || **__ Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  __** || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **__ The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. __** || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || **__ Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  __** || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || __**Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.**__  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || __** Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  **__ || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || __**Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.**__  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __** Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  **__ || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __** Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  **__ || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  || __** Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  **__ || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  || __** Volume is acceptable.  **__ || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || __Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.__  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 29/57